coal production

Forecasting coal production until 2100

Publication date:
2009-02-21
First published in:
Fuel
Authors:
S.H. Mohr, G.M. Evans
Abstract:

A model capable of projecting mineral resources production has been developed. The model includes supply and demand interactions, and has been applied to all coal producing countries. A model of worldwide coal production has been developed for three scenarios. The ultimately recoverable resources (URR) estimates used in the scenarios ranged from 700 Gt to 1243 Gt. The model indicates that worldwide coal production will peak between 2010 and 2048 on a mass basis and between 2011 and 2047 on an energy basis. The Best Guess scenario, assumed a URR of 1144 Gt and peaks in 2034 on a mass basis, and in 2026 on an energy basis.

Published in: Fuel, Volume 88, Issue 11, November 2009, Pages 2059-2067
Available from: ScienceDirect

Potential for Coal-to-Liquids Conversion in the U.S.-Resource Base

Publication date:
2009-05-22
First published in:
Natural Resources Research
Authors:
G.D. Croft, T.W. Patzek
Abstract:

By applying the multi-Hubbert curve analysis to coal production in the United States, we demonstrate that anthracite production can be modeled with a single Hubbert curve that extends to the practical end of commercial production of this highest-rank coal. The production of bituminous coal from existing mines is about 80% complete and can be carried out at the current rate for the next 20 years. The production of subbituminous coal from existing mines can be carried out at the current rate for 40–45 years. Significant new investment to extend the existing mines and build new ones would have to commence in 2009 to sustain the current rate of coal production, 1 billion tons per year, in 2029. In view of the existing data, we conclude that there is no spare coal production capacity of the size required for massive coal conversion to liquid transportation fuels. Our analysis is independent of other factors that will prevent large-scale coal liquefaction projects: the inefficiency of the process and either emissions of greenhouse gases or energy cost of sequestration.

Published in: Natural Resources Research, article in press
Available from: SpringerLink

Syndicate content